IT’S NOT ON THE FINAL – “NEW LIFE” BULLETIN
If you read church bulletins you’ve seen those “Bible Questions” where you are asked the name of Jabok’s wife, or something like that. They’re fun, but I never do them. Do you? Probably not, unless you’re envisioning winning a Bible Bowl or maybe Jeopardy. So I’m going to test you, even though I know you won’t take the time to answer. Your answering is not the point. The point is you will read the question. Maybe.
Here we go. What is the difference between “blameless” and “sinless?” There are several places in the Bible where we are told so and so was “Blameless before the Lord.” Does that mean “sinless?” If not, why not? Are you blameless? You may say, as do lots of folks on the “net,” that you are blameless because Jesus died for your sins. So blameless and sin are tied together.
In Luke 1:6, speaking of Zechariah and Elizabeth, it says, “Both of them were upright in the sight of God, observing all the commandments and regulations blamelessly.” First of all, lets recognize the death of Jesus was about thirty some years away. They were “upright in the sight of God.” They observed all the commandments and regulations blamelessly.” All of them? How many is that? Ten, or the whole Law? So, even with all that, they were not really without some blame. Were they sinners and blameless at the same time? How?
Here’s one that asks about your idea of inspiration. Does inspiration mean everything in the Bible is literally true? Take for example Psalm 90:10. “The length of our days is seventy years, or eighty, if we have the strength.” Is that true? Contrast that with Genesis 6:3. “Then the Lord said, ‘My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal: his days will be a hundred and twenty years.’” Which is true?
Before I go on, let me introject here that I’m not challenging the validity of scripture. I’m asking questions about how we interpret scripture, i.e., hermeneutics. In fact, (tongue-in-cheek) hermeneutic questions might be on the final, like “Who is your neighbor?” How you interpret the teachings of Jesus will depend on how you answer that question.
Look at I Cor. 5:5. Paul is dealing with a case of some sort where, “A man has his father’s wife.” He instructs the church to “Hand this man over to Satan, so that his sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord.” (NIV) It should be pointed out that the NIV interpreters did some interpolating here. The actual word for “sinful nature” is “body” or “flesh” which is different from “sinful nature”, but is an attempt to help in understanding what Paul meant. What did Paul mean? Some try to link it to II Cor. 2:7, but it doesn’t fit the context.
What about I Cor. 15:29? “Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead?” (NIV) What does that mean? If you look, which you don’t need to, you’ll find various attempts to answer it.
Question: When was the Old Covenant replaced with the New? A long-standing teaching of Colossians 2:13 is that the Old Covenant was nailed to the cross. In other words, with the death of Jesus the Old Covenant was over. If that were true, it sure didn’t show it in the early church.
The cross happened about AD 30 or so. The church met in Jerusalem in about AD 50 to discuss the Jew/ Gentile issue. That’s a good twenty years after the cross. It should also be noted that the meeting was in Jerusalem, surely a place where, if the Old Covenant was nailed to the cross, it would be a primary doctrine. However, in Acts 15:21, James says, “For Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogue on every Sabbath.” He said this in relationship to how much of the Old Covenant should be required of Gentile converts.
Since Paul was there, don’t you think it would have behooved him to speak up and say, “I’m about to write to the Colossians and tell them the Old Covenant was nailed to the cross. All this talk of Moses and the law is a moot point. Those nails removed the law, even from we who are Jews.” (The letter to the Colossians is said by some to be written sometime in the 50s.)
I apologize for answering that last question. I just couldn’t help it. Well, I didn’t tell you what was nailed to the cross. I’ll leave that up to you, if you’re interested. But maybe I’ve asked enough questions to make you realize how easy it is to let other people tell us what the Bible means, rather than digging for our selves.
CONCERNS: Rachel Mitchell is having back and neck problems. Gary Overstreet is in Raleigh Court undergoing rehab. Scott Blessing is just about over a bout with gout. Martha Foy and Joanne Elder are job hunting. Former member, Betty Shepherd had cancer surgery and is now at home. Jim White’s mother, Carol Jones. Sheila Jansen and daughter, Amber Weaver. Marjorie Wilson, Melanie Gentry, Joni Beach’s aunt, Pat Voss and a niece, Jamie Cole. Wayne Phlegar, David Albert, Leena Bolin’s aunt, Lee Nicklas, and a cousin, Tolly Nicklas. A friend of Leena’s, Chris Campbell has had a stroke. Ray & Darnel Barns, Gil Richardson, Stephanie Rigney, Jim and
Mary Smith and Tim Elder
OUR DAILY BREAD” DEC. 5-10
Monday: Genesis 15:1-21
Tuesday: Psalm 2:1-11
Wednesday: Mark 5:1-20
Thursday: Hebrews 11:1-18
Friday: I Thess. 4:1-12
Saturday: Psalm 130:1-8
OUR DAILY BREAD: DEC. 12-17
Monday: Genesis 2:15-3:7
Tuesday: Exodus 4:1-17
Wednesday: Hebrews 11:1-18
Thursday: Ephesians 4:17-32
Friday: II Cor. 4:7-18
Saturday: Psalm 47:1-9
THE CHRISTMAS PARTY
Due to scheduling problems, the Christmas “Party” will be more of a Christmas celebration which will take place on Super Sunday, December, 18th. There will be no special menu, just the regular pot luck of Super Sunday. Neither will there be a gift exchange. However, the annex will be decorated and music provided.
CHRISTMAS EVENING SERVICE
A Christmas Eve service will be held at the building. More details in the next bulletin. However, the time will be 6:00 P. M.
SUNDAY MORNING ADULT CLASS
Mike Branch is starting a class on the prophet Isaiah on Sunday mornings. There is always good discussion in that class.
The Roanoke County Sheriff’s Office has sent out notice of a scam going on in the Roanoke area. They have asked that we make note of it for our members.
The scam involves someone placing calls and impersonating a law enforcement officer. The caller claims the victim has failed to show up for jury duty. Jail time is threatened if a fine is not paid. Most of you are aware of this scam, but the Sheriff’s Office says it has increased recently and wanted us to put out the word.
If you should experience such a call, the best thing to do is refuse to speak to them and then call the Roanoke City Police at 540-853-2211
The seasonal poinsettias will be in the windows next Sunday. By the way, those of you who attend on Wednesday evening might offer your help in decorating the tree in the annex.
For some time, Judy Hall has given her talents to placing flower arrangements in both buildings. She has asked Leena Bolin to take over that job and Leena has already started. Thanks Leena.